In short:

The federal election will be called tomorrow for May 3, the ABC has confirmed.

It triggers a five-week campaign to convince voters whether Labor under Anthony Albanese or the Coalition under Peter Dutton is most fit to lead the country.

What’s next?

The prime minister will head to government house tomorrow morning to call the election.

  • dumblederp@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    As usual I’ll vote for left independents, then Labor, then liberal, then the right wing independents.

  • Fleur_@hilariouschaos.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Don’t vote 1 for the major parties guys. Minor parties and independents don’t need a majority they just need to prevent either of the big ones from getting one and they’ll be forced to negotiate.

    • MisterFrog@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The exception here being teal independents who vote with the Libs, as the colour name suggests, they’re not for workers. The only difference is that they believe in climate change and are not as socially conservative.

      Handy tool: https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/

    • eureka@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Plus, you can control where your preferences go anyway if your first choices don’t get elected.

    • imoldgreeeg@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Am seriously considering just deleting my news apps until it’s over. I am in a safe seat. I know how to get local info so I can decide who’s a climate/progressive independent and who’s a cooker. I don’t think I can handle hearing how more gas exploration and firing 40 thousand people is the way forward.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      If it wasn’t for Cyclone Alfred, I reckon my prediction of 12 April (given WA went crazy good for Labor) would’ve been correct.

  • repomonkey@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ll be voting for whoever seems the most communist. Which is of course literally none of them. Even on the left-wing ones are just centrists.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      The Greens range from centre-left to genuine communists. There aren’t many of the latter, but it’s more than you’ll find in Labor. And even Labor’s centrism is closer to communism than the LNP’s far right.

    • Mantzy81@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Though that does technically make them more communist than the LNP so number ALP above LNP but vote for whoever is more left above ALP.

    • eureka@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ll be voting for whoever seems the most communist. Which is of course literally none of them. Even on the left-wing ones are just centrists.

      Some electorates have Socialist Alliance (explicitly democratic socialists, not to be confused with capitalist social democrats like typical Greens), VicSoc (the major sub-party is SAlt, a “revolutionary” communist organisation despite their electoralism), and some independents and Greens are open communists.

      Know your candidates if you want to vote for anti-capitalists. If you’re unlucky you might have to settle for the Senate only, but you should still push as “left” as possible in the House of Reps even if they aren’t anti-capitalist.

  • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    A May 3 decision between a giant douche and a turd sandwich. I’ll be voting for an independent, and definitely not the commie greens.

    • Nath@aussie.zoneM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 days ago

      I was discussing this just a couple of days ago. Greens have terrible marketing and are in desperate need of a rebrand. I’m curious though: Which of their policies are you opposed to? Because honestly: if breaking up bank cartels, restoring Internet privacy laws, promoting local manufacturing, science and research as well as improving the calibre of education are bad, then I guess I’m bad.

      For me, my criticism of Greens comes mainly from putting stuff in policies that would be better suited to “dreams and aspirations”. They have a tendency to put stuff in there that are unspecific or at least out of the realms of what government does. But for all of that, I struggle to point to anything on their policy stuff and say “that’s an awful position”. At least, even if I’m not totally on-board, I see where they’re coming from. And that’s another point. Their policies page overwhelms you with too much to actually go through in one sitting. But, look at the Liberal/Labor equivalent pages? Greens are super open about what they stand for and what they would like to achieve. Labor have a few bullet points and Libs have a marketing brochure.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        That Labor page is a bit pathetic isn’t it.

        I imagine they’re going to roll out something fancy once the election is announced.

        I’m a bit surprised neither of the two major parties really seems interested in environmental sustainability. Last election the teal independents really stole the show.

        LNP’s nuclear power plan is just an excuse to keep burning coal for another 30 years. I think most people who actually care about emissions will see that, but the existence of a plan will ease the conscience of LNP voters.

        • Nath@aussie.zoneM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          So I had a brief look at the Labor policies, and to be frank, it all looks reasonable. I didn’t see anything there where I thought “that’s an awful position”.

          So I re-visited the Liberal version. Maybe they all sound fine at first. Oh wow the Liberal one is awful. It’s all ‘Labor bad’ and ‘Under Labor…’ and ‘fix the mess of Labor’. Why are they the only party of the three to trash talk their opponents?

          • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I think that’s pretty classic conservative politics isn’t it?

            Not specifically whingeing about everyone else maybe but certainly undoing all the mistakes the progressives have made.

        • recursiveInsurgent@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          They’re a good option although I can’t tell if you really care about animal rights or you’re a fool who would like to splinter the 3rd biggest party into smaller options. The thing about the environment is that it is a meta-issue, all other issues cease to matter if the environment becomes unliveable.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            Luckily, splintering is generally-speaking not an issue, because of how our voting system works.

            Technically

            Technically speaking, if you splintered so much that the Greens fell behind on 1st preference votes, they could be eliminated early. But in that case it would probably have to be because a different left-wing environment-focused party (maybe AJP) did better than them, and Greens votes would probably go there after elimination.

    • notgold@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I thought Mr musk taught us that we can be capitalist and save the planet at the same time