• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    There is zero chance of Russia withdrawing from the current territories at this point. Also, why would Russia give shit if France and UK sent troops to Ukraine. Russian army is at around 1.5 million troops, while the EU could scrape up a few thousand troops at best. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/british-army-troops-ukraine-defence-b2701635.html

    Meanwhile, the US provides the bulk of NATO accounting for over 70% of arms and majority of the troops. Without the US, there is no NATO. Anybody who understands basic arithmetic can see how absurd this whole notion is.

    • direwolf@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Numbers alone don’t count. During World War II, Germany could have conquered Russia if it didn’t have to fight the powerful US in the west. That’s the reason Putin might accept the plan. Without the US in Europe, Putin might think he can conquer Europe.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Germany could have conquered Russia

        Germany was already losing when the US entered the war

        • direwolf@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          No. In December 1941 when the US entered the war after Hitler foolishly declared war on the US, Russia had simply stopped Germany outside of Moscow.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The alternate reality you inhabit is fascinating. Meanwhile, here’s what a book produced by US military has to say on the subject.

        The fact that you’re historically illiterate explains why you have ideas that have no basis in reality. Maybe read a book for once in your life.

        • direwolf@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          By 1944, Russia had fully recovered from the German invasion and was a powerful military. That was not the case in 1942. When Hitler launched his 1942 summer offensive, he had to keep units in the west to repel any invasion of France by the Western allies.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            You can read the whole book, USSR was the main force fighting the nazis and did far more than all the allies combined. Your historical illiteracy is frankly an embarrassment.

            • direwolf@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I know that but the Western allies kept Hitler from concentrating his forces against Russia. Also, the West through Arctic convoys gave Russia supplies. Finally, it was the West which bombed Germany not Russia.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 hours ago

                The reality is that US companies continued to work with the nazis well into the war. And as the book I linked explains in great detail, USSR would have won the war regardless. Your whole premise here is nonsense born out of sheer ignorance. Instead of making inane comments on here and wasting people’s time, go read a book and learn about the subject you’re attempting to debate.