And can you describe what you think is wrong with that article? Does it make you question whether those 60+ dead were unrelated to the Israeli attack??
If that’s the case then it’s just an issue of the Guardian being written for smarter people
You gave a link accusing them of quoting Israeli officials
You don’t seem to be able to back up your accusation that they have been avoiding to use the word ‘killed’. So why make it?
The Guardian is not misinforming their readers about what’s happening in Gaza.
The way you’re talking about this is telling me that you’re too far gone to look at these things objectively
Do you have any examples of the Guardian dancing around the word ‘killed’? The fact you have to resort to their reporting on unrelated issues seems to suggest that’s not really the case
Do you have anything to back this up? I’ve never felt The Guardian was using euphemisms
The article claims the exact opposite, ie. that the mentioned amount of bombs was largely dropped on targets within Gaza.
The term ‘Gaza envelope’ does not appear once and looks like a fabrication
With Hamas seemingly agreeing to most of Israel’s terms, I think he gave them a hard ‘last chance’ in order to force it.
You sound like an account ran by the Mossad to discredit pro-Palestinian posters