Other questions include whether science organisation receives funding from China and whether it is a climate or ‘environmental justice’ project

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 days ago

    Hello Trump administration, are you taking appropriate measures to fuck off and mind your own business?

  • quokka@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 days ago

    hopefully those bodies are treating such a questionnaire with the respect it deserves

  • melbaboutown@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    What the actual fuck is happening

    So like universities and scientific organisations have to fall in line with whatever odd ideas this guy thinks up to go after, or they lose the funding for research?

    I really don’t like this direction. This is an unreasonable amount of control and a dangerous precedence to set

    • Frenchys_prospecting@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      They’re using this tactic to get us used to them being in control of our nation.

      This time next year we will be part of America or part of the fight against it

      • Darkmoon_UK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Pretty clear choice for me. US administration are downright scum. I’d sooner we take our chances in a fragile geopolitical position than ever dance to their tune.

        Start strengthening EU alliances. If we’re going to play politics of convenience that’s better done with China. They might be capable of things that shock us, but they also seem to value and respond to sensible economic exchange. It’s becoming rapidly apparent that the US are more about Russian style domination - you can’t even bargain with that.

      • melbaboutown@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Ugh. Both options suck.

        I don’t want to be part of the mango madness and also recognise that we could be in a bad position to fight back

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    The entire world needs to treat American investment as a potential threat/exploitable weakness, and have a Plan B ready.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      you don’t even need to lie about taking appropriate measures, because that’s just down to personal definition

    • dustycups@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      On second thoughts, thats dumb and probably fraud. why not tell tthe truth?

      “China gave me funding and I’m gay”
      “Oh you never said your funding was contingent on this”

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Even though this is batshit insane, based on everything we’ve seen it’s reasonable to assume that the yanks will pull the funding regardless of whether the orgs accede to any of this bullshit. Of course, some of them don’t need any overseas encouragement to pull authoritarian shit.

  • CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Funniest possible response would be to send honest responses exclusively expressed in Australian slang.

    “Is your organisation a climate or environmental justice project?”

    “Yeah nah. We’re not here to fuck spiders. Rollin’ up the sleeves an givin’ it a red-hot crack!”

  • casmael@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Titlegore but yeah I would hope that landed straight in the bin to be honest

  • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Does your organization encourage free speech and encourage open debate and free sharing of information? [yes/no]1. If yes, please describe.

    “If you are not encuraging free speech, thats ok, but if you do, please elaborate”